Manual data transfers
Someone copies data between several systems every day. I automate the flow without replacing your existing landscape unless that is needed.
I build custom AI and automation solutions for companies. I automate recurring flows, connect existing systems and add AI where it brings a real advantage. I only choose the tech after the process is understood.
Whether AI, Microsoft 365, custom software or classic automation: what counts is not the tool, but a setup that runs reliably and fits your data, costs and workflows.
Someone copies data between several systems every day. I automate the flow without replacing your existing landscape unless that is needed.
People search for information in files, SharePoint or emails. I build setups that make existing company data accessible in a structured way.
You want to use AI or automation, but do not yet know where it actually makes sense. I start with the process and then pick the fitting tech.
Many AI projects start with the question of which model to use. I start with the process.
I check where the real bottleneck sits, which data is processed and what the requirements are for cost, data protection and maintainability. Only then do I decide whether local AI, a cloud model, classic automation, Microsoft 365 or custom software is the right setup.
That way you do not get a setup that depends unnecessarily on one vendor, model or tool.
For sensitive data a local setup can make sense. If demanding models or high scale matter more, cloud AI can be the better choice. The concrete process decides.
Technology-open does not mean arbitrary. n8n, Microsoft 365, cloud APIs, local AI or custom software can each be the right basis. What counts is how they fit into the existing landscape and can be operated long term.
The Pilicore-Agent is my reference architecture. It shows how I build AI and automation technically: modular, extensible and independent of a single model vendor.
The architecture connects agents, workflows, company knowledge and integrations. The underlying process stays decoupled from individual LLM vendors and tools.
This is not a product to buy. It is a concrete look at how I work and the technical direction I also follow in client projects.
Selected projects show how different technical problems were solved in practice. From AI-supported knowledge search to small automations that take over recurring manual work completely.
Search grown document bases in natural language and get answers with traceable sources.
View case studyRecurring system updates automated, including reboot checks, logging and error notification.
View case studyI connect business-process understanding with technical delivery. My background covers business-critical applications in insurance, complex IT landscapes in logistics, international IT projects, cloud migrations and work in regulated environments.
More on my background and how I work is on the About page.
Not always the strongest model and not always a specific platform. What counts is the setup that fits process, data risk and cost.
Problem: information sits scattered in documents, emails or company systems. Solution: an assistant reaches your sources in a controlled way and puts relevant information where your team works.
Problem: recurring work costs time and creates unnecessary errors. Solution: automate manual flows, connect systems and leave only the cases with people that actually need a decision.
Problem: systems do not talk to each other, or it is unclear which tech a process actually needs. Solution: connect existing systems, assess options and design an architecture that stays maintainable long term.
No packages and no artificial product tiers. The basis is a day rate, aligned with usual rates for independent IT and AI consulting. That way you can roughly gauge the possible effort before you enquire.
Orientation only, not a quote. After scoping, a fixed price is also possible. The first conversation is non-binding.
A short note is enough. Describe what still runs by hand, where data is copied between systems or which flow costs unnecessary time.
I usually reply within 1 to 2 business days and say clearly whether and how I can help.